Re: [PATCH 5/6] can: esd_usb: Improved support for CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING

[Vincent MAILHOL]

Le sam. 9 juil. 2022 à 03:14, Frank Jungclaus <frank.jungclaus@xxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> Bus error reporting has already been implemented for a long time, but
> before it was always active! Now it's user controllable by means off the
> "berr-reporting" parameter given to "ip link set ... ", which sets
> CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING within priv->can.ctrlmode.
>
> In case of an ESD_EV_CAN_ERROR_EXT now unconditionally supply
> priv->bec.rxerr and priv->bec.txerr with REC and TEC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Jungclaus <frank.jungclaus@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
> index 588caba1453b..09649a45d6ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
> @@ -230,12 +230,23 @@ static void esd_usb_rx_event(struct esd_usb_net_priv *priv,
>         if (id == ESD_EV_CAN_ERROR_EXT) {
>                 u8 state = msg->msg.rx.data[0];
>                 u8 ecc   = msg->msg.rx.data[1];
> -               u8 rxerr = msg->msg.rx.data[2];
> -               u8 txerr = msg->msg.rx.data[3];
> +
> +               priv->bec.rxerr = msg->msg.rx.data[2];
> +               priv->bec.txerr = msg->msg.rx.data[3];
>
>                 netdev_dbg(priv->netdev,
>                            "CAN_ERR_EV_EXT: dlc=%#02x state=%02x ecc=%02x rec=%02x tec=%02x\n",
> -                          msg->msg.rx.dlc, state, ecc, rxerr, txerr);
> +                          msg->msg.rx.dlc, state, ecc, priv->bec.rxerr, priv->bec.txerr);
> +
> +               if (ecc) {
> +                       priv->can.can_stats.bus_error++;
> +                       stats->rx_errors++;
> +               }
> +
> +               if (state == priv->old_state &&
> +                   !(priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING))
> +                       /* Neither a state change nor active bus error reporting */
> +                       return;
>
>                 skb = alloc_can_err_skb(priv->netdev, &cf);
>                 if (skb == NULL) {
> @@ -270,16 +281,14 @@ static void esd_usb_rx_event(struct esd_usb_net_priv *priv,
>                                  * berr-counters might stay on values like
>                                  * 95 forever ...
>                                  */
> -                               txerr = 0;
> -                               rxerr = 0;
> +                               priv->bec.txerr = 0;
> +                               priv->bec.rxerr = 0;
>                                 break;
>                         }
>                 }
>
> -               if (ecc) {
> -                       priv->can.can_stats.bus_error++;
> -                       stats->rx_errors++;
> -
> +               if (ecc && (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING)) {
> +                       /* Only if bus error reporting is active ... */
>                         cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT | CAN_ERR_BUSERROR;
>
>                         /* Store error in CAN protocol (type) in data[2] */
> @@ -301,29 +310,26 @@ static void esd_usb_rx_event(struct esd_usb_net_priv *priv,
>                         if (!(ecc & SJA1000_ECC_DIR))
>                                 cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_TX;
>
> -                       /* Store error in CAN protocol (location) in data[3] */
> +                       /* Store error position in the bit stream of the CAN frame in data[3] */
>                         cf->data[3] = ecc & SJA1000_ECC_SEG;
>
>                         /* Store error status of CAN-controller in data[1] */
>                         if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING) {
> -                               if (txerr >= 96)
> +                               if (priv->bec.txerr >= 96)

I checked and was just surprised that we do not have any macro for the
different thresholds.

Does it make sense to add below declarations to include/uapi/linux/can/error.h?

#define CAN_ERROR_WARNING_THRESHOLD 96
#define CAN_ERROR_PASSIVE_THRESHOLD 128

I will try to submit a patch for that by the end of today.

>                                         cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING;
> -                               if (rxerr >= 96)
> +                               if (priv->bec.rxerr >= 96)
>                                         cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
>                         } else if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) {
> -                               if (txerr >= 128)
> +                               if (priv->bec.txerr >= 128)
>                                         cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE;
> -                               if (rxerr >= 128)
> +                               if (priv->bec.rxerr >= 128)
>                                         cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
>                         }
>
> -                       cf->data[6] = txerr;
> -                       cf->data[7] = rxerr;
> +                       cf->data[6] = priv->bec.txerr;
> +                       cf->data[7] = priv->bec.rxerr;
>                 }
>
> -               priv->bec.txerr = txerr;
> -               priv->bec.rxerr = rxerr;
> -
>                 netif_rx(skb);
>         }
>  }
> @@ -1021,7 +1027,8 @@ static int esd_usb_probe_one_net(struct usb_interface *intf, int index)
>
>         priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
>         priv->can.ctrlmode_supported = CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY |
> -               CAN_CTRLMODE_CC_LEN8_DLC;
> +                                      CAN_CTRLMODE_CC_LEN8_DLC |
> +                                      CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING;
>
>         if (le16_to_cpu(dev->udev->descriptor.idProduct) ==
>             USB_CANUSBM_PRODUCT_ID)
> --
> 2.25.1
>