Re: [PATCH v8 25/33] dt-bindings: crypto: rockchip: convert to new driver bindings

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sun Jul 10 2022 - 11:12:56 EST


On 07/07/2022 10:37, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> Le Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 05:25:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 06/07/2022 16:28, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>>> Le Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 07:29:04AM -0600, Rob Herring a écrit :
>>>> On Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:04:04 +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>>>> The latest addition to the rockchip crypto driver need to update the
>>>>> driver bindings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../crypto/rockchip,rk3288-crypto.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>>>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>>>
>>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>>
>>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>>> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/rockchip,rk3288-crypto.yaml: allOf:0:then:properties:clock-names: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
>>>> [{'const': 'aclk'}, {'const': 'hclk'}, {'const': 'sclk'}, {'const': 'apb_pclk'}] is too long
>>>> [{'const': 'aclk'}, {'const': 'hclk'}, {'const': 'sclk'}, {'const': 'apb_pclk'}] is too short
>>>> False schema does not allow 4
>>>> 1 was expected
>>>> 4 is greater than the maximum of 2
>>>> 4 is greater than the maximum of 3
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I upgraded to dt-schema 2022.07 and fail to reproduce all errors.
>>
>> Visible on older dtschema (2022.6.dev10+gcd64f75fe091), visible on
>> newest (2022.7).
>>
>> Exactly the same error.
>>
>
> Hello
>
> I am sorry, I finally succesfully reproduced it.
> Just doing what the hints gives (removing max/min-items) from "static" list fix the issue.

Not sure what do you mean by "static list". I think you should drop
min/maxItems from clock-names/reset-names in allOf:if:then sections.

> Does I need to remove your Reviewed-by ?

Let's drop, so it will be back to my to-review queue.

Best regards,
Krzysztof