[PATCH v4 2/2] of: unittest: make unittest_gpio_remove() consistent with unittest_gpio_probe()
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Fri Jul 08 2022 - 17:45:46 EST
On the ->remove() stage the callback uses physical device node instead of one
from GPIO chip and the variable name which is different to one used in
unittest_gpio_probe(). Make these consistent with unittest_gpio_probe().
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: no changes
drivers/of/unittest.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 5a842dfc27e8..eafa8ffefbd0 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -1620,20 +1620,19 @@ static int unittest_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int unittest_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct unittest_gpio_dev *gdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct unittest_gpio_dev *devptr = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
- struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
- dev_dbg(dev, "%s for node @%pOF\n", __func__, np);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s for node @%pfw\n", __func__, devptr->chip.fwnode);
- if (!gdev)
+ if (!devptr)
return -EINVAL;
- if (gdev->chip.base != -1)
- gpiochip_remove(&gdev->chip);
+ if (devptr->chip.base != -1)
+ gpiochip_remove(&devptr->chip);
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
- kfree(gdev);
+ kfree(devptr);
return 0;
}
--
2.35.1