[PATCH 4/6] can: esd_usb: Improved behavior on esd CAN_ERROR_EXT event (3)

[Frank Jungclaus]

Started a rework initiated by Vincents remark about "You should not
report the greatest of txerr and rxerr but the one which actually
increased." Now setting CAN_ERR_CRTL_[RT]X_WARNING and
CAN_ERR_CRTL_[RT]X_PASSIVE depending on REC and TEC

Signed-off-by: Frank Jungclaus <frank.jungclaus@xxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
index 0a402a23d7ac..588caba1453b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
@@ -304,11 +304,17 @@ static void esd_usb_rx_event(struct esd_usb_net_priv *priv,
 			/* Store error in CAN protocol (location) in data[3] */
 			cf->data[3] = ecc & SJA1000_ECC_SEG;
 
-			if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING ||
-			    priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) {
-				cf->data[1] = (txerr > rxerr) ?
-					CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE :
-					CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
+			/* Store error status of CAN-controller in data[1] */
+			if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING) {
+				if (txerr >= 96)
+					cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING;
+				if (rxerr >= 96)
+					cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
+			} else if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) {
+				if (txerr >= 128)
+					cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE;
+				if (rxerr >= 128)
+					cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
 			}
 
 			cf->data[6] = txerr;
-- 
2.25.1