On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 10:01 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 08/07/22 04:46, Zhongjun Tan ha scritto:Hi Angelo,
From: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Remove condition with no effect
Signed-off-by: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
index db71b032770d..6be6d4f3b585 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
@@ -295,8 +295,6 @@ static int mtk_adda_pad_top_event(struct
snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU:
if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==
MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2_CLK_P2)
regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
0x39);
- else if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==
MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2)
- regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
0x31);
I think that this needs some clarification from MediaTek: was 0x31 a
typo here?
Regards,
Angelo
This patch can be accepted. The 0x31 is not typo, the logic of this
code is not concise enough.
Thanks,
Jiaxin.Yu
else
regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
0x31);
break;