RE: [PATCH v6 4/5] bpf: Add bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper
From: Roberto Sassu
Date: Fri Jul 08 2022 - 08:12:55 EST
> From: Roberto Sassu [mailto:roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 1:01 PM
> > From: KP Singh [mailto:kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 1:49 AM
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 6:04 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
[...]
> > > nit: when both trusted_keyring_serial and trusted_keyring_id are passed to
> the
> > > helper, then this should be rejected as invalid argument? (Kind of feels a bit
> > > like we're cramming two things in one helper.. KP, thoughts? :))
> >
> > EINVAL when both are passed seems reasonable. The signature (pun?) of the
> > does seem to get bloated, but I am not sure if it's worth adding two
> > helpers here.
>
> Ok for EINVAL. Should I change the trusted_keyring_id type to signed,
> and use -1 when it should not be specified?
I still have the impression that a helper for lookup_user_key() is the
preferred solution, despite the access control concern.
David, may ask if this is the correct way to use the key subsystem
API when permission check is deferred? key_permission() is currently
not defined outside the key subsystem.
The first three functions will be exposed by the kernel to eBPF programs
and can be called at any time. bpf_<key_helper> is a generic helper
dealing with a key.
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_lookup_user_key, u32, serial, unsigned long, flags)
{
...
key_ref = lookup_user_key(serial, flags, KEY_DEFER_PERM_CHECK);
...
return (unsigned long)key_ref_to_ptr(key_ref);
}
BPF_CALL_X(bpf_<key_helper>, struct key, *key, ...)
{
ret = key_read_state(key);
...
ret = key_validate(key);
...
ret = key_permission(key_ref, <key helper-specific permission>);
...
}
BPF_CALL_1(bpf_key_put, struct key *, key)
{
key_put(key);
return 0;
}
An eBPF program would do for example:
SEC("lsm.s/bpf")
int BPF_PROG(bpf, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)
{
struct key *key;
...
key = bpf_lookup_user_key(serial, flags);
...
ret = bpf_key_helper(key, ...);
...
key_put(key);
}
Thanks
Roberto