Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Reuse new rpmh-common bindings

[Luca Weiss]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Fri May 20, 2022 at 12:33 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/05/2022 09:03, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Stop defining the properties twice and use the ones provided in the new
> > qcom,rpmh-common.yaml.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> > * New patch
> > 
> >  .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml      | 22 +++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> > index fae3363fed02..e822dc099339 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> > @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ description: |
> >     least one RPMh device child node pertaining to their RSC and each provider
> >     can map to multiple RPMh resources.
> >  
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: qcom,rpmh-common.yaml#
> > +
> >  properties:
> >    reg:
> >      maxItems: 1
> > @@ -131,28 +134,13 @@ properties:
> >        - qcom,sm8450-pcie-anoc
> >        - qcom,sm8450-system-noc
> >  
> > -  '#interconnect-cells':
> > -    enum: [ 1, 2 ]
> > -
> > -  qcom,bcm-voters:
> > -    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > -    items:
> > -      maxItems: 1
> > -    description: |
> > -      List of phandles to qcom,bcm-voter nodes that are required by
> > -      this interconnect to send RPMh commands.
> > -
> > -  qcom,bcm-voter-names:
> > -    description: |
> > -      Names for each of the qcom,bcm-voters specified.
> > +  '#interconnect-cells': true
> >  
>
> So this explains why your previous patch had such values... The order is
> messed up - first you move common parts to common file, then you add
> SM6350 support.

Right, that makes much more sense. Will split out qcom,rpmh-common first
and use in rpmh.yaml and then afterwards introduce sm6350.

Regards
Luca

>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof