Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Reuse new rpmh-common bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/05/2022 09:03, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Stop defining the properties twice and use the ones provided in the new
> qcom,rpmh-common.yaml.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> * New patch
> 
>  .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml      | 22 +++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> index fae3363fed02..e822dc099339 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ description: |
>     least one RPMh device child node pertaining to their RSC and each provider
>     can map to multiple RPMh resources.
>  
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: qcom,rpmh-common.yaml#
> +
>  properties:
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -131,28 +134,13 @@ properties:
>        - qcom,sm8450-pcie-anoc
>        - qcom,sm8450-system-noc
>  
> -  '#interconnect-cells':
> -    enum: [ 1, 2 ]
> -
> -  qcom,bcm-voters:
> -    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> -    items:
> -      maxItems: 1
> -    description: |
> -      List of phandles to qcom,bcm-voter nodes that are required by
> -      this interconnect to send RPMh commands.
> -
> -  qcom,bcm-voter-names:
> -    description: |
> -      Names for each of the qcom,bcm-voters specified.
> +  '#interconnect-cells': true
>  

So this explains why your previous patch had such values... The order is
messed up - first you move common parts to common file, then you add
SM6350 support.


Best regards,
Krzysztof