Re: [RFC v16 0/9] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)

From: Zhangfei Gao
Date: Tue Dec 07 2021 - 05:35:40 EST




On 2021/12/7 下午6:27, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Zhangfei,

On 12/3/21 1:27 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
Hi, Eric

On 2021/10/27 下午6:44, Eric Auger wrote:
This series brings the IOMMU part of HW nested paging support
in the SMMUv3.

The SMMUv3 driver is adapted to support 2 nested stages.

The IOMMU API is extended to convey the guest stage 1
configuration and the hook is implemented in the SMMUv3 driver.

This allows the guest to own the stage 1 tables and context
descriptors (so-called PASID table) while the host owns the
stage 2 tables and main configuration structures (STE).

This work mainly is provided for test purpose as the upper
layer integration is under rework and bound to be based on
/dev/iommu instead of VFIO tunneling. In this version we also get
rid of the MSI BINDING ioctl, assuming the guest enforces
flat mapping of host IOVAs used to bind physical MSI doorbells.
In the current QEMU integration this is achieved by exposing
RMRs to the guest, using Shameer's series [1]. This approach
is RFC as the IORT spec is not really meant to do that
(single mapping flag limitation).

Best Regards

Eric

This series (Host) can be found at:
https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/v5.15-rc7-nested-v16
This includes a rebased VFIO integration (although not meant
to be upstreamed)

Guest kernel branch can be found at:
https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/shameer_rmrr_v7
featuring [1]

QEMU integration (still based on VFIO and exposing RMRs)
can be found at:
https://github.com/eauger/qemu/tree/v6.1.0-rmr-v2-nested_smmuv3_v10
(use iommu=nested-smmuv3 ARM virt option)

Guest dependency:
[1] [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Thanks a lot for upgrading these patches.

I have basically verified these patches on HiSilicon Kunpeng920.
And integrated them to these branches.
https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk/tree/uacce-devel-5.16
https://github.com/Linaro/qemu/tree/v6.1.0-rmr-v2-nested_smmuv3_v10

Though they are provided for test purpose,

Tested-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you very much. As you mentioned, until we do not have the
/dev/iommu integration this is maintained for testing purpose. The SMMU
changes shouldn't be much impacted though.
The added value of this respin was to propose an MSI binding solution
based on RMRRs which simplify things at kernel level.

Current RMRR solution requires uefi enabled,
and QEMU_EFI.fd  has to be provided to start qemu.

Any plan to support dtb as well, which will be simpler since no need QEMU_EFI.fd anymore.

Thanks