Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Fix asym_fits_capacity() task_util type

[Vincent Donnefort]

On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 02:14:10PM +0000, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > task_util is an unsigned long value, compared with a CPU capacity which is
> > unsigned long as well. There's no need for an intermediate implicit int
> > cast.
> > 
> > Fixes: b4c9c9f15649 ("sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path")
> 
> Do either of these patches actually *fix* anything? Afaict they're an
> absolute no-op, even in terms of code-gen due to the promotion rules.
> 
> Yes, its arguably nicer to not rely on those implicit promotions etc..
> but I don't think this warrants a Fixes tag or even being split in two
> patches.
> 
> Hmm?

As far as I know it doesn't change anything functionally speaking. So yeah,
let's consider it as a cleanup. I'll merge the changes and drop the Fix tag.