Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Fix asym_fits_capacity() task_util type

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 02:14:10PM +0000, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> task_util is an unsigned long value, compared with a CPU capacity which is
> unsigned long as well. There's no need for an intermediate implicit int
> cast.
> 
> Fixes: b4c9c9f15649 ("sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path")

Do either of these patches actually *fix* anything? Afaict they're an
absolute no-op, even in terms of code-gen due to the promotion rules.

Yes, its arguably nicer to not rely on those implicit promotions etc..
but I don't think this warrants a Fixes tag or even being split in two
patches.

Hmm?