Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Change the type and use of a variable

[Fabio M. De Francesco]

On Saturday, April 10, 2021 11:31:16 AM CEST Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Change the type of fw_current_in_ps_mode from u8 to bool, because
> > it is used everywhere as a bool and, accordingly, it should be
> > declared as a bool. Shorten the controlling
> > expression of an 'if' statement.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c        | 2 +-
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c index
> > 96fe172ced8d..8dc4dd8c6d4c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ void rtw_hal_dm_watchdog(struct adapter *padapter)
> > 
> >  void rtw_hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps(struct adapter *padapter)
> >  {
> > 
> > -	if (adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter)->fw_current_in_ps_mode == true) 
{
> > +	if (adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter)->fw_current_in_ps_mode) {
> > 
> >  		if (padapter->HalFunc.hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps)
> >  		
> >  			padapter-
>HalFunc.hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps(padapter); /* this
> >  			function caller is in interrupt context 
*/>  	
> >  	}
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h index
> > 0a48f1653be5..0767dbb84199 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ struct pwrctrl_priv {
> > 
> >  	u8 LpsIdleCount;
> >  	u8 power_mgnt;
> >  	u8 org_power_mgnt;
> > 
> > -	u8 fw_current_in_ps_mode;
> > +	bool fw_current_in_ps_mode;
> > 
> >  	unsigned long	DelayLPSLastTimeStamp;
> >  	s32		pnp_current_pwr_state;
> >  	u8 pnp_bstop_trx;
> 
> If this is only checked, how can it ever be true?  Who ever sets this
> value?
>
You're right. It is not set, therefore the "if" control expression cannot 
ever be "true".

Can I delete this statement in a new patch? Or you prefer I send the whole 
series again with this change in patch 4/4?

Thanks,

Fabio
>
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h