Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power

[Lukasz Luba]

On 1/27/21 9:15 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-01-21, 10:39, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> > As it's a RFC, it still misses the cpufreq sysfs implementation, but would
> > be addressed if all agree.
>
> Not commenting on the whole stuff but if you ever need something for cpufreq, it
> is already there. Look for these.
>
> store_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
> store_one(scaling_max_freq, max);
>
> Hopefully they will work just fine.

So, can I assume you don't mind to plumb it into these two?

Yes, I know them and the tricky macro. I just wanted to avoid
one patch for this macro and one patch for cpufreq_cooling.c,
which would use it.

If you agree and Chanwoo agrees for the devfreq, and Daniel
for the new callback in cooling device, then I would continue
by adding missing patches for cpufreq-cooling part.

Regards,
Lukasz