Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power

[Viresh Kumar]

On 26-01-21, 10:39, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> As it's a RFC, it still misses the cpufreq sysfs implementation, but would
> be addressed if all agree.

Not commenting on the whole stuff but if you ever need something for cpufreq, it
is already there. Look for these.

store_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
store_one(scaling_max_freq, max);

Hopefully they will work just fine.

-- 
viresh