Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] clk: X1000: Add FIXDIV for SSI clock of X1000.

[Zhou Yanjie]

Hi Stephen,

å 2020/5/28 äå9:12, Stephen Boyd åé:
> Quoting Zhou Yanjie (2020-05-27 10:56:35)
> > @@ -40,8 +43,47 @@
> >   #define OPCR_SPENDN0           BIT(7)
> >   #define OPCR_SPENDN1           BIT(6)
> >   
> > +/* bits within the USBPCR register */
> > +#define USBPCR_SIDDQ           BIT(21)
> > +#define USBPCR_OTG_DISABLE     BIT(20)
> > +
> >   static struct ingenic_cgu *cgu;
> >   
> > +static int x1000_usb_phy_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +       void __iomem *reg_opcr          = cgu->base + CGU_REG_OPCR;
> > +       void __iomem *reg_usbpcr        = cgu->base + CGU_REG_USBPCR;
> > +
> > +       writel(readl(reg_opcr) | OPCR_SPENDN0, reg_opcr);
> Please include linux/io.h for writel/readl.


Sure, I'll add it.


> > +       writel(readl(reg_usbpcr) & ~USBPCR_OTG_DISABLE & ~USBPCR_SIDDQ, reg_usbpcr);
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void x1000_usb_phy_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +       void __iomem *reg_opcr          = cgu->base + CGU_REG_OPCR;
> > +       void __iomem *reg_usbpcr        = cgu->base + CGU_REG_USBPCR;
> > +
> > +       writel(readl(reg_opcr) & ~OPCR_SPENDN0, reg_opcr);
> > +       writel(readl(reg_usbpcr) | USBPCR_OTG_DISABLE | USBPCR_SIDDQ, reg_usbpcr);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int x1000_usb_phy_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +       void __iomem *reg_opcr          = cgu->base + CGU_REG_OPCR;
> > +       void __iomem *reg_usbpcr        = cgu->base + CGU_REG_USBPCR;
> > +
> > +       return (readl(reg_opcr) & OPCR_SPENDN0) &&
> > +               !(readl(reg_usbpcr) & USBPCR_SIDDQ) &&
> > +               !(readl(reg_usbpcr) & USBPCR_OTG_DISABLE);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct clk_ops x1000_otg_phy_ops = {
> > +       .enable         = x1000_usb_phy_enable,
> > +       .disable        = x1000_usb_phy_disable,
> > +       .is_enabled     = x1000_usb_phy_is_enabled,
> > +};
> > +
> >   static const s8 pll_od_encoding[8] = {
> >          0x0, 0x1, -1, 0x2, -1, -1, -1, 0x3,
> >   };
> > @@ -277,4 +377,4 @@ static void __init x1000_cgu_init(struct device_node *np)
> >   
> >          ingenic_cgu_register_syscore_ops(cgu);
> >   }
> > -CLK_OF_DECLARE(x1000_cgu, "ingenic,x1000-cgu", x1000_cgu_init);
> > +CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(x1000_cgu, "ingenic,x1000-cgu", x1000_cgu_init);
> Why does this change to DECLARE_DRIVER? Can you please add a comment
> here in the code indicating what other driver is probing this compatible
> string?


Yes, CGU has some children devices, this is useful for probing children 
devices in the case where the device node is compatible with 
"simple-mfd" (see commit 03d570e1a4dc for a reference).

Thanks and best regards!