Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (bpf_trace)

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:32 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This fails as we added bpf_test_run_tracing in net/bpf/test_run.c
> which gets built only CONFIG_NET is enabled. Which, this particular
> config, disables.
>
> Alexei, if it's okay with you. I can send a patch that separates the
> tracing test code into kernel/bpf/test_run_trace.c which depends
> only on CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.

In such situation we typically add __weak dummy call.
May be split will work too.
or move tracing_prog_ops to kernel/bpf/core.c ?