Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (bpf_trace)

[KP Singh]

This fails as we added bpf_test_run_tracing in net/bpf/test_run.c
which gets built only CONFIG_NET is enabled. Which, this particular
config, disables.

Alexei, if it's okay with you. I can send a patch that separates the
tracing test code into kernel/bpf/test_run_trace.c which depends
only on CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.

- KP

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:22 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:18 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:13 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/4/20 10:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Changes since 20200304:
> > > >
> > >
> > > on i386:
> > >
> > > ld: kernel/trace/bpf_trace.o:(.rodata+0x38): undefined reference to `bpf_prog_test_run_tracing'
> >
> > KP,
> > Please take a look.
>
> Sure. Taking a look.
>
> - KP