Re: [RFC PATCH v6 5/7] psci: Add hvc call service for ptp_kvm.

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jianyong Wu wrote:

> This patch is the base of ptp_kvm for arm64.

This patch ...

> ptp_kvm modules will call hvc to get this service.
> The service offers real time and counter cycle of host for guest.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c |  2 ++
>  include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h |  4 ++++
>  include/linux/arm-smccc.h            | 12 ++++++++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/psci.c                  | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 07e57a49d1e8..e4ad38042ef6 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  #include <asm/virt.h>
>  
>  #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
> +#include <linux/clocksource_ids.h>

Same ordering issue and lack of file.
 
> diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> index 1d68d5613dae..426d749e8cf8 100644
> --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,10 @@ static inline bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +bool is_arm_arch_counter(void *unuse)

A global function in a header file? You might want to make this static
inline. And while at it please s/unuse/unused/

> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
>  #endif
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> index 0debf49bf259..339bcbafac7b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
>  
>  #include <kvm/arm_psci.h>
> +#include <linux/clocksource_ids.h>

Sigh.
  
>  /*
>   * This is an implementation of the Power State Coordination Interface
> @@ -392,6 +393,8 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	u32 func_id = smccc_get_function(vcpu);
>  	u32 val[4] = {};
>  	u32 option;
> +	u64 cycles;
> +	struct system_time_snapshot systime_snapshot;

Also here you might notice that the variables are not randomly ordered.

Thanks,

	tglx