Re: [PATCH][next] xfrm: fix missing break on AF_INET6 case

[Florian Westphal]

Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It appears that there is a missing break statement for the AF_INET6 case
> that falls through to the default WARN_ONCE case. I don't think that is
> intentional. Fix this by adding in the missing break.

Yes, I sent same patch a few minutes ago:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1114377/

I don't mind which one gets applied.