Re: [PATCH] printk: CON_PRINTBUFFER console registration is a bit racy

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (09/14/18 20:19), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/14/18 10:59), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 
> > Well, I am not sure if it is worth the code complexity.
> >
> 
> Well, I don't think we need to bother that much here. Besides,
> exclusive_console is cleared under logbuf_lock with preemption
> disabled now. So we set it under logbuf_lock and !irq and we
> clear it under logbuf_lock and !irq. Looks quite OK to me.

Petr, Steven,
any opinions? The patch is rather trivial.

	-ss