Re: [PATCH] platform/chrome: Make CROS_EC_PROTO a user selectable option

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Tue Aug 18 2015 - 09:37:51 EST



Hi,

On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 03:02:26 PM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Bartlomiej,
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback.
>
> On 08/18/2015 02:40 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 09:15:06 AM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The boolean CROS_EC_PROTO symbol is selected by MFD_CROS_EC but that can
> >> cause Kconfig circular dependencies so is better to change the select to
> >
> > Could you please give a reference to the problem or error message
> > that you're getting (I was not following the previous discussion).
> >
>
> Yes, the original Kconfig warning message was:
>
> warning: (MFD_CROS_EC) selects CHROME_PLATFORMS which has unmet direct dependencies (X86 || ARM)
>
> Paul fixed on [0] by making MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM but that
> is not really true since the driver could be used in other platforms so
> I tried to instead fix it by removing unneeded dependencies in [1] but
> one of the patches was nacked by Geert [2] who mentioned the issue about
> mixing select and "depends on".

I think that Geert's comments are valid. Dependencies should limit
the config option to the archs for which the driver is really needed
(the rest can be handled with COMPILE_TEST dependency).

> >> a depends on. But in order to be able to change that, the CROS_EC_PROTO
> >> symbol has to be one that can be selected by the user.
> >
> > Looking at the code behind the config option it seems that it is just
> > a helper library and should not be made user-visible. Why can't
>
> Yeah, I in fact used as a reference the DRM/KMS helpers (DRM_KMS_HELPER)
> that is selected by drivers instead of depending on it.
>
> > the issue be fixed the other way (make other config options select
> > CROS_EC_PROTO consistently)?
> >
>
> That is another option indeed. I thought that the use of select was
> discouraged and that it was preferable to use "depends on" even when
> the Kconfig symbol is a boolean to enable support for some helpers.

No, this is not true. It is just that "select" has to be used with
care. ;)

> But I don't really have a strong opinion on either approach tbh.

Please rework your patches to use "select".

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> > Samsung Electronics
> >
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/20/219
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/24/689
> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/17/103
>
> Best regards,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/