Re: Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review

From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Date: Mon Jul 27 2015 - 10:44:25 EST


On 07/27/2015 04:17 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> instruction. A thread maybe unable
>
> to << missing word
>
> acquire a lock because it is
> already acquired by another thread. It then may pass the lock's
> flag as futex word and the value representing the acquired state
> as the expected value to a futex() wait operation.

Thanks, Heinrich. Fixed.

Cheers,

Michael




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/