Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: Rework two functions related to CPU offline

[Viresh Kumar]

On 27-07-15, 16:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Since __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare() and __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
> are about CPU offline rather than about CPU removal, rename them to
> cpufreq_offline_prepare() and cpufreq_offline_finish(), respectively.
> 
> Also change their argument from a struct device pointer to a CPU
> number, because they use the CPU number only internally anyway
> and make them void as their return values are ignored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   32 ++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/