Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4

[David Lang]

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> I'm also not sure if the bug ever happens with preemption disabled.
> Sasha, was that you who reported that you cannot reproduce it without
> preemption? It strikes me that there's a race condition in
> __cond_resched() wrt preemption, for example: we do
>
>        __preempt_count_add(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
>        __schedule();
>        __preempt_count_sub(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
>
> and in between the __schedule() and __preempt_count_sub(), if an
> interrupt comes in and wakes up some important process, it won't
> reschedule (because preemption is active), but then we enable
> preemption again and don't check whether we should reschedule (again),
> and we just go on our merry ways.
>
> Now, I don't see how that could really matter for a long time -
> returning to user space will check need_resched, and sleeping will
> obviously force a reschedule anyway, so these kinds of races should at
> most delay things by just a tiny amount,

If the machine has NOHZ and has a cpu bound userspace task, it could take quite 
a while before userspace would trigger a reschedule (at least if I've understood 
the comments on this thread properly)

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/