Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86_64,vsyscall: Rewrite comment and clean up headers in vsyscall code

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Mon Nov 03 2014 - 15:34:45 EST


On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> vsyscall_64.c is just vsyscall emulation. Tidy it up accordingly.
>>
>> If my comment editing offends anyone, let me know and I can fix it.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c | 51 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
>> index 2d912629c96e..ee622f8183f3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
>> @@ -1,52 +1,37 @@
>> /*
>> - * Copyright (C) 2001 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> SuSE
>> - * Copyright 2003 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
>> + * Mostly copyright (c) 2012-2014 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We usualy leave the old copyright notices around even if the code
> which is related to them has been removed more or less completely.
>
> So I change this to:
>
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 2012-2014 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *
> * Based on the original implementation:
> * Copyright (C) 2001 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> SuSE
> * Copyright 2003 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
>
> and apply the whole lot.

Would it make more sense to move those copyright notices to
arch/x86/vdso/vma.c? That's where most of the code ended up.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/