Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Enable use of Solid State Hybrid Drives

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Wed Oct 29 2014 - 22:35:54 EST


On 2014-10-29 20:05, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Jason" == Jason B Akers <jason.b.akers@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Jason> The following series enables the use of Solid State hybrid drives
Jason> ATA standard 3.2 defines the hybrid information feature, which
Jason> provides a means for the host driver to provide hints to the
Jason> SSHDs to guide what to place on the SSD/NAND portion and what to
Jason> place on the magnetic media.

I have been ripping my hair out in this department for a while.

A colleague and I presented our findings at SNIA SDC a few weeks
ago. I'm trying to find out if there's an embargo on the slides or if I
can post them.

First of all I completely agree with Dave's comments about hooking into
fadvise()/madvise().

The problem with xadvise() is that it handles only one part of this - it handles the case of tying some sort of IO related priority information to an inode. It does not handle the case of different parts of the file, at least not without adding specific extra tracking for this on the kernel side.

I think we've needed a proper API for passing in appropriate hints on a per-io basis for a LONG time.

My challenge with hints has been trying to bridge all the various
existing approaches with the new stuff that's coming down the pipe in
T10/T13 (LBMD hints) and NFS v4.2 ditto. That turned into a huge mapping
table as well as a few amendments to what's currently being worked on in
the standards bodies.

That is the big challenge. We've tried (and failed) in the past to define a set of hints that make sense. It'd be a shame to add something that's specific to a given transport/technology. That said, this set of hints do seem pretty basic and would not necessarily be a bad place to start. But they are still very specific to this use case. And who knows what will happen on the device side. I might assume that WILLNEED is the same as HOT, and that DONTNEED is the same as cold. And then applications get upset when vendor X and Y treat them somewhat differently, because that's how it fit into their architecture.

This is the primary reason that hints never happened previously.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/