Re: macvtap performance regression (bisected) between 3.13 and 3.14-rc1

[Vlad Yasevich]

On 02/27/2014 03:52 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Vlad,
> 
> commit 6acf54f1cf0a6747bac9fea26f34cfc5a9029523
>     macvtap: Add support of packet capture on macvtap device.
> 
> causes a performance regression for iperf traffic between two KVM guests
> on my s390 system. Both guests are connected via two macvtaps on the same OSA
> network card.
> Before that patch I get ~20 Gbit/sec between two guests, afterwards I get
> ~4Gbit/sec
> 
> Latency seems to be unchanges (uperf 1byte ping pong).
> 
> According to ifconfig in the guest, I have ~ 1500 bytes per packet with this
> patch and ~  40000 bytes without. So for some reason this patch causes the
> network stack to do segmentation. (the guest kernel stays the same, only host 
> kernel is changed).
> 
> Any ideas?

I am looking.  It shouldn't cause addition segmentations and when I ran
netperf on the code I didn't see any difference in the throughput.

-vlad

> 
> 
> Christian
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/