Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx CAN controller support.

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> The only remaining question is if we should create generic DT binding
> >> for fifo depth. Arnd, Rob: Any opinion about it?
> >> Definitely will be worth to have one generic binding if this is generic feature.
> >> But if this is just specific feature for us then current properties should
> >> be fine.
> >>
> >> In general all these xlnx,XXX properties just reflect all configurable options
> >> which you can setup in design tool which means that provide full hw description
> >> with all variants and they are automatically generated from tools.
> >>
> >> Please let me know what you think.
> > 
> > I like:
> > 
> >     rx-fifo-depth
> >     tx-fifo-depth
> 
> No problem with that. Let Kedar to fix it according this and he will send v2 with this.
> 

Sounds reasonable to me too.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/