Re: [PATCH 03/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE structures & implementation.

[Juri Lelli]

On 11/20/2013 09:23 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu,  7 Nov 2013 14:43:37 +0100
> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
>> +/*
>> + * This function validates the new parameters of a -deadline task.
>> + * We ask for the deadline not being zero, and greater or equal
>> + * than the runtime.
>> + */
>> +static bool
>> +__checkparam_dl(const struct sched_param2 *prm)
>> +{
>> +	return prm && (&prm->sched_deadline) != 0 &&
>> +	       (s64)(&prm->sched_deadline - &prm->sched_runtime) >= 0;
> 
> Patch 6 brought this to my attention. Looks like using the address of
> the fields is wrong. I know patch 6 fixes this, but lets make it
> correct in this patch first.
> 

Fixed.

Thanks,

- Juri

> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>>   * check the target process has a UID that matches the current process's
>>   */
>>  static bool check_same_owner(struct task_struct *p)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/