Re: [patch 0/8] mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing v5

[Rik van Riel]

On 10/21/2013 05:26 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 11:46 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > here is an update to the cache sizing patches for 3.13.
> >
> > 	Changes in this revision
> >
> > o Drop frequency synchronization between refaulted and demoted pages
> >    and just straight up activate refaulting pages whose access
> >    frequency indicates they could stay in memory.  This was suggested
> >    by Rik van Riel a looong time ago but misinterpretation of test
> >    results during early stages of development took me a while to
> >    overcome.  It's still the same overall concept, but a little simpler
> >    and with even faster cache adaptation.  Yay!
>
> Oh, I liked the previous approach with direct competition between the
> refaulted and demoted page :) Doesn't the new approach favor the
> refaulted page too much? No wonder it leads to faster cache adaptation,
> but could it also cause degradations for workloads that don't benefit
> from it? Were there any tests for performance regressions on workloads
> that were not the target of the patchset?

This is a good question, and one that is probably
best settled through experimentation.

Even with the first scheme (fault refaulted page to
the inactive list), those pages only need 2 accesses
to be promoted to the active list.

That is because a refault tends to immediately be
followed by an access (after all, the attempted
access causes the page to get loaded back into memory).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/