Re: [patch 7/7 v2] x86: add xloadflags bit for efi runtime supporton kexec

From: Dave Young
Date: Wed Nov 13 2013 - 20:37:54 EST


On 11/13/13 at 08:20am, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/05/2013 12:20 AM, dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Old kexec-tools can not load new kernel. The reason is previously kexec-tools
> > do not fill efi_info in x86 setup header thus efi init fail and switch
> > to noefi boot. In new kexec-tools it will by default fill efi_info and
> > pass other efi required infomation to 2nd kernel so kexec kernel efi
> > initialization will success finally.
> >
> > To prevent from breaking userspace, add a new xloadflags bit so kexec-tools
> > will check the flag and switch to old logic.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/boot/header.S | 9 ++++++++-
> > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/boot/header.S
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/boot/header.S
> > @@ -391,7 +391,14 @@ xloadflags:
> > #else
> > # define XLF23 0
> > #endif
> > - .word XLF0 | XLF1 | XLF23
> > +
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_EFI)
> > +# define XLF4 XLF_EFI_KEXEC
> > +#else
> > +# define XLF4 0
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + .word XLF0 | XLF1 | XLF23 | XLF4
> >
> > cmdline_size: .long COMMAND_LINE_SIZE-1 #length of the command line,
> > #added with boot protocol
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > #define XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G (1<<1)
> > #define XLF_EFI_HANDOVER_32 (1<<2)
> > #define XLF_EFI_HANDOVER_64 (1<<3)
> > +#define XLF_EFI_KEXEC (1<<4)
> >
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >
> >
>
> Also needs to be added to Documentation/x86/boot.txt with the exact
> semantics being exposed.

Will do

>
> -hpa
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/