Re: [PATCH] perf record: mmap output file - v2

[Namhyung Kim]

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:35:53 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/15/13 1:31 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:55:31 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>>> When recording raw_syscalls for the entire system, e.g.,
>>>      perf record -e raw_syscalls:*,sched:sched_switch -a -- sleep 1
>>>
>>> you end up with a negative feedback loop as perf itself calls
>>> write() fairly often. This patch handles the problem by mmap'ing the
>>> file in chunks of 64M at a time and copies events from the event buffers
>>> to the file avoiding write system calls.
>>>
>>> Before (with write syscall):
>>>
>>> perf record -o /tmp/perf.data -e raw_syscalls:*,sched:sched_switch -a -- sleep 1
>>> [ perf record: Woken up 0 times to write data ]
>>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 81.843 MB /tmp/perf.data (~3575786 samples) ]
>>>
>>> After (using mmap):
>>>
>>> perf record -o /tmp/perf.data -e raw_syscalls:*,sched:sched_switch -a -- sleep 1
>>> [ perf record: Woken up 31 times to write data ]
>>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 8.203 MB /tmp/perf.data (~358388 samples) ]
>>
>> Why do they have that different size?
>
> perf calls write() for each mmap, each time through the loop. Each
> write generates 2 events (syscall entry + exit) -- ie., generates more
> events. That's the negative feedback loop.

Aha, okay.  So it mostly matters to syscall tracing, right?  For a
normal record session, it seems that the effect is not that large:

Before:

  $ perf stat -r3 --null --sync -- perf record -a -- sleep 5
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.467 MB perf.data (~20420 samples) ]
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.544 MB perf.data (~23750 samples) ]
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.482 MB perf.data (~21073 samples) ]
  
   Performance counter stats for 'perf record -a -- sleep 5' (3 runs):
  
         5.174476094 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.07% )

  $ perf record -- perf bench sched pipe
  # Running sched/pipe benchmark...
  # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
  
       Total time: 21.271 [sec]
  
        21.271357 usecs/op
            47011 ops/sec
  [ perf record: Woken up 21 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 5.643 MB perf.data (~246524 samples) ]


After:

  $ perf stat -r3 --null --sync -- perf record -a -- sleep 5
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.459 MB perf.data (~20055 samples) ]
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.463 MB perf.data (~20230 samples) ]
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.467 MB perf.data (~20401 samples) ]
  
   Performance counter stats for 'perf record -a -- sleep 5' (3 runs):
  
         5.085910919 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.06% )

  $ perf record -- perf bench sched pipe
  # Running sched/pipe benchmark...
  # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
  
       Total time: 21.175 [sec]
  
        21.175406 usecs/op
            47224 ops/sec
  [ perf record: Woken up 21 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 5.612 MB perf.data (~245206 samples) ]


Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/