Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1

From: Måns Rullgård
Date: Wed Sep 25 2013 - 11:52:53 EST

Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> I'd strongly suggest you make your binutils compatible with newer
>> instruction syntax instead of making the kernel more complex.
> Meaning I play whack-a-mole as this becomes permission to depend on
> endless new gnuisms just because they're there and nobody else is
> regression testing against them, not because they actually add anything.

Since when is assembling the instructions correctly, as specified in the
arch ref, and not in some other random way a gnuism?

Måns Rullgård
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at