On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 03:31:33PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:<Good idea. I think after base version is accepted, we can add this. >On 09/23/2013 01:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:Thought so. Have you thought about providing a hwmon bridge ?Supported by SandyBridge and newer CPUs.<We feel that the power capping framework is the right place to show
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v5: Merged to 3.12-rc1
v4: Replaced INIT_DELAYED_WORK with INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK
v3: Added Cc:
v2: Fix missing symbol error on i386 builds
Dropped leftover pr_info from debugging
I am inclined to drop this patch set, as I received neither test nor code
review feedback even though the patch set has been out there for a long time.
Also, I am concerned that it overlaps or even conflicts with the proposed
Power Cap/RAPL driver (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/19/260).
the RAPL data. This is not just monitoring but also control.
There are other drivers getting developed using this framework to
expose an uniform sysfs interface.
Thanks,
Guenter