Re: Why does test_bit() take a volatile addr?

From: Rob Landley
Date: Sun Sep 22 2013 - 17:37:32 EST

Next message: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [PATCH, RFC 10/12] random: cap the rate which the /dev/urandompool gets reseeded"
Previous message: JÃrn Engel: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] random: make fast_mix() honor its name"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Why does test_bit() take a volatile addr?"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: Why does test_bit() take a volatile addr?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 09/15/2013 11:08:35 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:

Predates git, does anyone remember the rationale?

Depends which git: http://landley.net/kdocs/fullhist/ :)

Rob--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [PATCH, RFC 10/12] random: cap the rate which the /dev/urandompool gets reseeded"
Previous message: JÃrn Engel: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] random: make fast_mix() honor its name"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Why does test_bit() take a volatile addr?"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: Why does test_bit() take a volatile addr?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]