Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, September 20, 2013 12:30:19 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> I *think* we can just drop the module requesting stuff entirely, because it
> >> doesn't seem to work anyway and udev is handling this for us.
> >
> Yes. looks like acpi_processor_load_module() is not needed.
> udev will do the work.

OK, I'll cut a patch to drop that stuff.


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/