Re: Regression on cpufreq in v3.12-rc1

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1460,6 +1460,9 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>         unsigned int ret_freq = 0;
>
> +       if (cpufreq_disabled() || !cpufreq_driver)
> +               return -ENOENT;
> +

But given that a cpufreq driver is just like any other driver, isn't the
proper thing to do to return -EPROBE_DEFER?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/