Re: linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3.12-rc1)

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > So better than last time, but it would be still nice to figure out where
>> > the last lot came from.  I have the "git log --oneline --no-walk" list if
>> > someone wants them.
>> >
>> > Some breakdown of that list:

>> I'm totally confused by these stats..
>>
>> The target-pending/for-next pull had ~30 commits with the term 'target'
>> in the first word of the commit summary, and yours truly had 40 commits
>> merged.
>>
>> Is there a reason why these would not be showing up in the above..?
>
> These are the lists if things that went into Linus' tree but were *not*
> in linux-next prior to the merge window opening.

Perhaps it should be made a little bit clearer that it's a hall of shame, not a
hall of fame? If you miss "the last lot", and continue reading to the various
"top ten"s, you really think you want to be part of them...

The first time they got published, I was also caught by this :-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/