Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove all uses of printf's %n

[Kees Cook]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> All users of %n are calculating padding size when using seq_file, so
>> >> instead use the new last_len member for discovering the length of the
>> >> written strings.
>> >
>> > Would it make sense to provide a seq_pad(...) function instead, to avoid
>> > exposing more seq_file internals to its callers?
>>
>> We'd still need to track how much to pad.
>
> If we add "size_t pad_until;" to "struct seq_file", we can do
>
> void seq_setwidth(struct seq_file *m, size_t size)
> {
>         m->pad_until = m->count + size;
> }
>
> void seq_pad(struct seq_file *m, char c)
> {
>         int size = m->pad_until - m->count;
>         if (size > 0)
>                 seq_printf(m, "%*s", size, "");
>         if (c)
>                 seq_putc(m, c);
> }
>
> and use like
>
>   seq_setwidth(m, 21);
>   seq_printf(m, "%s%d", con->name, con->index);
>   seq_pad(m, '\n');

Ooh, I like this a lot! Much cleaner.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/