Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dmaengine: add driver for Samsung s3c24xx SoCs

[Vinod Koul]

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:35:23AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> This adds a new driver to support the s3c24xx dma using the dmaengine
> and makes the old one in mach-s3c24xx obsolete in the long run.
> 
> Conceptually the s3c24xx-dma feels like a distant relative of the pl08x
> with numerous virtual channels being mapped to a lot less physical ones.
> The driver therefore borrows a lot from the amba-pl08x driver in this
> regard. Functionality-wise the driver gains a memcpy ability in addition
> to the slave_sg one.
> 
> The driver supports both the method for requesting the peripheral used
> by SoCs before the S3C2443 and the different method for S3C2443 and later.
> 
> On earlier SoCs the hardware channels usable for specific peripherals is
> constrainted while on later SoCs all channels can be used for any peripheral.
> 
> Tested on a s3c2416-based board, memcpy using the dmatest module and
> slave_sg partially using the spi-s3c64xx driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> +static enum dma_status s3c24xx_dma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
> +		dma_cookie_t cookie, struct dma_tx_state *txstate)
> +{
> +	struct s3c24xx_dma_chan *s3cchan = to_s3c24xx_dma_chan(chan);
> +	struct virt_dma_desc *vd;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	enum dma_status ret;
> +	size_t bytes = 0;
> +
> +	ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
> +	if (ret == DMA_SUCCESS)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * There's no point calculating the residue if there's
> +	 * no txstate to store the value.
> +	 */
> +	if (!txstate)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&s3cchan->vc.lock, flags);
> +	ret = dma_async_is_complete(cookie, txstate->last, txstate->used);
Did you see what dma_cookie_status() does. There is no need to call
dma_async_is_complete() here!

> +	if (ret != DMA_SUCCESS) {
> +		struct s3c24xx_txd *txd;
> +		struct s3c24xx_sg *dsg;
> +
> +		vd = vchan_find_desc(&s3cchan->vc, cookie);
> +		if (vd) {
> +			/* On the issued list, so hasn't been processed yet */
> +			txd = to_s3c24xx_txd(&vd->tx);
> +
> +			list_for_each_entry(dsg, &txd->dsg_list, node)
> +				bytes += dsg->len;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * Currently running, so sum over the pending sg's and
> +			 * the currently active one.
> +			 */
> +			txd = s3cchan->at;
> +
> +			dsg = list_entry(txd->at, struct s3c24xx_sg, node);
> +			list_for_each_entry_from(dsg, &txd->dsg_list, node);
> +				bytes += dsg->len;
> +
> +			bytes += s3c24xx_dma_getbytes_chan(s3cchan);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s3cchan->vc.lock, flags);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This cookie not complete yet
> +	 * Get number of bytes left in the active transactions and queue
> +	 */
> +	dma_set_residue(txstate, bytes);
> +
> +	/* Whether waiting or running, we're in progress */
> +	return ret;

Aprt form this driver looks fine to me...

~Vinod

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/