Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove all uses of printf's %n

[George Spelvin]

> It'd be consistent with all the other %p<foo> types.
>
> vsnprintf is already weird enough with %p uses,
> there's absolutely no reason to stretch it further
> with yet another odd access/format style.

Well, all the other %p<foo> types actually *use* the void * argument.
They print the thing pointed to, just in different ways.

What I'm proposing is fundamentally different, and much more
"printf internals" specific.

I hate creating an interface that requires a dummy pointer argument.

This would already be quite different in , and I hate creating a
new interface that requires a dummy pointer argument.


One nonsensical combination that gcc does *not* complain about
is "%0-c".  (It does bitch about "%-0c", however.)

Is "%0-127c" too ugly to live?

Note that I could generalize it, and allow "%0-<width>" to mean
"left-align, with trailing padding to column <width>" for ANY format
specifier if that would help.  It's easy in the printf code to compute
the field width necessary to make that work.
ANSI C says that %0- is permitted and means the same thing as %-
(- overrides 0), but that could be bent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/