Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() whichcalling instruction smc #1

From: Dave Martin
Date: Mon Sep 16 2013 - 13:11:59 EST


On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:37:12AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 08 September 2013 09:43:29 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Here is new version (v4) of omap secure part patch:
> >
> > Other secure functions omap_smc1() and omap_smc2() calling
> > instruction smc #0 but Nokia RX-51 board needs to call smc #1
> > for PPA access.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h index 0e72917..c4586f4
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> > extern u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32
> > nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 arg3, u32 arg4);
> > extern u32 omap_smc2(u32 id, u32 falg, u32 pargs);
> > +extern u32 omap_smc3(u32 id, u32 process, u32 flag, u32
> > pargs); extern phys_addr_t
> > omap_secure_ram_mempool_base(void); extern int
> > omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock(void);
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
> > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S index f6441c1..fd90125
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
> > @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
> > /*
> > - * OMAP44xx secure APIs file.
> > + * OMAP34xx and OMAP44xx secure APIs file.
> > *
> > * Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments, Inc.
> > * Written by Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
> > *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@xxxxxx>
> > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > *
> > * This program is free software,you can redistribute it
> > and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public
> > License version 2 as @@ -54,6 +56,23 @@ ENTRY(omap_smc2)
> > ldmfd sp!, {r4-r12, pc}
> > ENDPROC(omap_smc2)
> >
> > +/**
> > + * u32 omap_smc3(u32 service_id, u32 process_id, u32 flag,
> > u32 pargs) + * Low level common routine for secure HAL and
> > PPA APIs via smc #1 + * r0 - @service_id: Secure Service ID
> > + * r1 - @process_id: Process ID
> > + * r2 - @flag: Flag to indicate the criticality of operation
> > + * r3 - @pargs: Physical address of parameter list
> > + */
> > +ENTRY(omap_smc3)
> > + stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr}
> > + mov r12, r0 @ Copy the secure service ID
> > + mov r6, #0xff @ Indicate new Task call
> > + dsb @ Memory Barrier (not sure if needed, copied from
> > omap_smc2) + smc #1 @ Call PPA service
> > + ldmfd sp!, {r4-r11, pc}
> > +ENDPROC(omap_smc3)
> > +
> > ENTRY(omap_modify_auxcoreboot0)
> > stmfd sp!, {r1-r12, lr}
> > ldr r12, =0x104
>
> Dave, it is ok now?

Yes, that's sufficient to warn people to stop and think (at least, if
someone copy-pastes it, they will likely highlight the possible error by
copy-pasting the comment too). Thanks.

Acked-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/