[PATCH 3/3] KVM: Convert kvm_lock back to non-raw spinlock
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Mon Sep 16 2013 - 10:06:40 EST
In commit e935b8372cf8 ("KVM: Convert kvm_lock to raw_spinlock"),
the kvm_lock was made a raw lock. However, the kvm mmu_shrink()
function tries to grab the (non-raw) mmu_lock within the scope of
the raw locked kvm_lock being held. This leads to the following:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:659
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 55, name: kswapd0
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffffa0376eac>] mmu_shrink+0x5c/0x1b0 [kvm]
Pid: 55, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.4.34_preempt-rt
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8106f2ad>] __might_sleep+0xfd/0x160
[<ffffffff817d8d64>] rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x50
[<ffffffffa0376f3c>] mmu_shrink+0xec/0x1b0 [kvm]
[<ffffffff8111455d>] shrink_slab+0x17d/0x3a0
[<ffffffff81151f00>] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x130/0x260
[<ffffffff8111824a>] balance_pgdat+0x54a/0x730
[<ffffffff8111fe47>] ? set_pgdat_percpu_threshold+0xa7/0xd0
[<ffffffff811185bf>] kswapd+0x18f/0x490
[<ffffffff81070961>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50
[<ffffffff81061970>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
[<ffffffff81118430>] ? balance_pgdat+0x730/0x730
[<ffffffff81060d2b>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0
[<ffffffff8106e122>] ? finish_task_switch+0x52/0x100
[<ffffffff817e1e94>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff81060c50>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x
After the previous patch, kvm_lock need not be a raw spinlock anymore,
so change it back.
Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: gleb@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 18 +++++++++---------
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
index ba9e1c2..f886941 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ See the comments in spte_has_volatile_bits() and mmu_spte_update().
------------
Name: kvm_lock
-Type: raw_spinlock
+Type: spinlock_t
Arch: any
Protects: - vm_list
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 6e2d2c8..d027a72 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -4429,7 +4429,7 @@ static int mmu_shrink(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
if (nr_to_scan == 0)
goto out;
- raw_spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
int idx;
@@ -4473,7 +4473,7 @@ unlock:
break;
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
out:
return percpu_counter_read_positive(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7c36099..3acd631 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5273,7 +5273,7 @@ static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long va
smp_call_function_single(freq->cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1);
- raw_spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
if (vcpu->cpu != freq->cpu)
@@ -5283,7 +5283,7 @@ static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long va
send_ipi = 1;
}
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
if (freq->old < freq->new && send_ipi) {
/*
@@ -5436,12 +5436,12 @@ static void pvclock_gtod_update_fn(struct work_struct *work)
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
int i;
- raw_spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list)
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
set_bit(KVM_REQ_MASTERCLOCK_UPDATE, &vcpu->requests);
atomic_set(&kvm_guest_has_master_clock, 0);
- raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
}
static DECLARE_WORK(pvclock_gtod_work, pvclock_gtod_update_fn);
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 749bdb1..7c961e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ struct kvm;
struct kvm_vcpu;
extern struct kmem_cache *kvm_vcpu_cache;
-extern raw_spinlock_t kvm_lock;
+extern spinlock_t kvm_lock;
extern struct list_head vm_list;
struct kvm_io_range {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index da13379..3397a9c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
* kvm->lock --> kvm->slots_lock --> kvm->irq_lock
*/
-DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(kvm_lock);
+DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kvm_lock);
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(kvm_count_lock);
LIST_HEAD(vm_list);
@@ -491,9 +491,9 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(unsigned long type)
if (r)
goto out_err;
- raw_spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_add(&kvm->vm_list, &vm_list);
- raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
return kvm;
@@ -582,9 +582,9 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
struct mm_struct *mm = kvm->mm;
kvm_arch_sync_events(kvm);
- raw_spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_del(&kvm->vm_list);
- raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
kvm_free_irq_routing(kvm);
for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_BUSES; i++)
kvm_io_bus_destroy(kvm->buses[i]);
@@ -3057,10 +3057,10 @@ static int vm_stat_get(void *_offset, u64 *val)
struct kvm *kvm;
*val = 0;
- raw_spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list)
*val += *(u32 *)((void *)kvm + offset);
- raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -3074,12 +3074,12 @@ static int vcpu_stat_get(void *_offset, u64 *val)
int i;
*val = 0;
- raw_spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list)
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
*val += *(u32 *)((void *)vcpu + offset);
- raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
return 0;
}
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/