On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:07PM +0300, Marcus Sundman wrote:At 128 GB it is extremely small as it is, and I'm really strugglingWhat model are you using? It's possible that your flash device was
to fit all on it. Most of my stuff is on my NAS (which has almost 10
TB space), but still I need several code repositories and the
development environment and a virtual machine etc on this tiny 128
GB thing.
So, if I used some other filesystem, might that allow me to use a
larger portion of the SSD without this degradation? Or with a much
slower rate of degradation?
designed as a cache driver for windows. As such, it might have been
optimized for a read-mostly workload and not something for a lot of
random small writes.
The f2fs file system is designed for crappy flash drives with crappy
FTL's, so it might work be better for you.
But let me ask you this
--- how much is your data worth? How much would it cost to replace
your flash device with something better?