[233/251] zfcp: fix lock imbalance by reworking request queue locking
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Sep 11 2013 - 00:57:11 EST
3.6.11.9-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Martin Peschke <mpeschke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit d79ff142624e1be080ad8d09101f7004d79c36e1 ]
This patch adds wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout(), which is a
straight-forward descendant of wait_event_interruptible_timeout() and
wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq().
The zfcp driver used to call wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
in combination with some intricate and error-prone locking. Using
wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout() as a replacement
nicely cleans up that locking.
This rework removes a situation that resulted in a locking imbalance
in zfcp_qdio_sbal_get():
BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: events/1/0xffffff00/10
last function: zfcp_fc_wka_port_offline+0x0/0xa0 [zfcp]
It was introduced by commit c2af7545aaff3495d9bf9a7608c52f0af86fb194
"[SCSI] zfcp: Do not wait for SBALs on stopped queue", which had a new
code path related to ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_QDIOUP that took an early exit
without a required lock being held. The problem occured when a
special, non-SCSI I/O request was being submitted in process context,
when the adapter's queues had been torn down. In this case the bug
surfaced when the Fibre Channel port connection for a well-known address
was closed during a concurrent adapter shut-down procedure, which is a
rare constellation.
This patch also fixes these warnings from the sparse tool (make C=1):
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c:224:12: warning: context imbalance in
'zfcp_qdio_sbal_check' - wrong count at exit
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c:244:5: warning: context imbalance in
'zfcp_qdio_sbal_get' - unexpected unlock
Last but not least, we get rid of that crappy lock-unlock-lock
sequence at the beginning of the critical section.
It is okay to call zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen() with req_q_lock held.
Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke <mpeschke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #2.6.35+
Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c | 8 ++----
include/linux/wait.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c
index 50b5615..925fb1f 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c
@@ -224,11 +224,9 @@ int zfcp_qdio_sbals_from_sg(struct zfcp_qdio *qdio, struct zfcp_qdio_req *q_req,
static int zfcp_qdio_sbal_check(struct zfcp_qdio *qdio)
{
- spin_lock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
if (atomic_read(&qdio->req_q_free) ||
!(atomic_read(&qdio->adapter->status) & ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_QDIOUP))
return 1;
- spin_unlock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -246,9 +244,8 @@ int zfcp_qdio_sbal_get(struct zfcp_qdio *qdio)
{
long ret;
- spin_unlock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
- ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(qdio->req_q_wq,
- zfcp_qdio_sbal_check(qdio), 5 * HZ);
+ ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout(qdio->req_q_wq,
+ zfcp_qdio_sbal_check(qdio), qdio->req_q_lock, 5 * HZ);
if (!(atomic_read(&qdio->adapter->status) & ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_QDIOUP))
return -EIO;
@@ -262,7 +259,6 @@ int zfcp_qdio_sbal_get(struct zfcp_qdio *qdio)
zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen(qdio->adapter, 0, "qdsbg_1");
}
- spin_lock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
return -EIO;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index 6c6c20e..e4683e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -571,6 +571,63 @@ do { \
__wait_event_killable(wq, condition, __ret); \
__ret; \
})
+#define __wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout(wq, condition, \
+ lock, ret) \
+do { \
+ DEFINE_WAIT(__wait); \
+ \
+ for (;;) { \
+ prepare_to_wait(&wq, &__wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); \
+ if (condition) \
+ break; \
+ if (signal_pending(current)) { \
+ ret = -ERESTARTSYS; \
+ break; \
+ } \
+ spin_unlock_irq(&lock); \
+ ret = schedule_timeout(ret); \
+ spin_lock_irq(&lock); \
+ if (!ret) \
+ break; \
+ } \
+ finish_wait(&wq, &__wait); \
+} while (0)
+
+/**
+ * wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout - sleep until a condition gets true or a timeout elapses.
+ * The condition is checked under the lock. This is expected
+ * to be called with the lock taken.
+ * @wq: the waitqueue to wait on
+ * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for
+ * @lock: a locked spinlock_t, which will be released before schedule()
+ * and reacquired afterwards.
+ * @timeout: timeout, in jiffies
+ *
+ * The process is put to sleep (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) until the
+ * @condition evaluates to true or signal is received. The @condition is
+ * checked each time the waitqueue @wq is woken up.
+ *
+ * wake_up() has to be called after changing any variable that could
+ * change the result of the wait condition.
+ *
+ * This is supposed to be called while holding the lock. The lock is
+ * dropped before going to sleep and is reacquired afterwards.
+ *
+ * The function returns 0 if the @timeout elapsed, -ERESTARTSYS if it
+ * was interrupted by a signal, and the remaining jiffies otherwise
+ * if the condition evaluated to true before the timeout elapsed.
+ */
+#define wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout(wq, condition, lock, \
+ timeout) \
+({ \
+ int __ret = timeout; \
+ \
+ if (!(condition)) \
+ __wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout( \
+ wq, condition, lock, __ret); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
/*
* These are the old interfaces to sleep waiting for an event.
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/