Re: [PATCH RFC v2 13/16] ARM: tegra: split tegra_pmc_init() in two

[Stephen Warren]

On 08/27/2013 03:28 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Tegra's board file currently initializes clocks much earlier than those
> for most other ARM SoCs. The reason is:
> 
> * The PMC HW block is involved in the path of some interrupts (i.e. it
> inverts, or not, the IRQ input pin dedicated to the PMIC).
> 
> * So, that part of the PMC must be initialized early so that the IRQ
> polarity is correct.
> 
> * The PMC initialization is currently monolithic, and the PMC has some
> clock inputs, so the init routine ends up calling of_clk_get_by_name(),
> and hence clocks must be set up early too.
> 
> In order to defer clock initialization to the more typical location,
> split out the portions of tegra_pmc_init() that are truly IRQ-related
> into a separate tegra_pmc_init_irq(), which can be called from the
> machine descriptor's .init_irq() function, and defer the rest until
> the machine descriptor's .init_machine() function. With arch/arm calling
> of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init() this also allows the removal of
> .init_time() hook.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v1->v2:
> - took Stephen Warren's patch provided to separate Tegra's pmc_init
> - sqashed in .init_time removal and reworded patch text

I think it'd be better to keep the 2 patches separate so the two logical
changes are in different patches. I suppose it isn't a huge deal though.

Either way, on this patch, your S-o-b line is missing above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/