Re: [ 000/102] 3.10.6-stable review

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sat Aug 10 2013 - 23:21:43 EST


On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:07:08PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 01:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 02:42:24PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> On 08/09/2013 07:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.6 release.
> >>> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>> let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Responses should be made by Sun Aug 11 01:46:31 UTC 2013.
> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>>
> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.6-rc1.gz
> >>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> greg k-h
> >>>
> >
>
> Patches applied to 3.0.89, 3.4.56 and 3.10.5
>
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
>
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5:
> (3.4.57-rc1, 3.10.6-rc1)
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics:
> (3.0.90-rc1, 3.4.57-rc1, and 3.10.6-rc1)
>
> dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the
> previous dmesgs for each of these releases. dmesg emerg, crit, alert,
> err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/