Re: [PATCH 1/6] clk: Tegra: Add CPU0 clock driver
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Aug 08 2013 - 23:19:23 EST
On 9 August 2013 00:20, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't think so. I think it's reasonable to have a per-SoC cpufreq
> driver whose primary content is the parameterization data and/or custom
> hooks for a unified core cpufreq driver. The duplicate parts of each
> cpufreq driver can be moved into the core cpufreq driver, but the
> non-duplicate parts remain. That's how many other subsystems work (MMC,
> USB, ASoC spring to mind).
Guys in the --to list:
Please shout before its too late...
I can understand why Stephen is asking not to implement a virtual clock
driver for cpu as there is no clock corresponding to that.. We are just playing
with existing clocks there..
But I thought these clock APIs can be considered as hooks that we were
looking for and so shouldn't be a problem..
But yes, different people see things differently..
So, if I take Stephen's suggestions then I need to implement hooks into
cpufreq-cpu0 driver for taking freq-table/ setting clk rates, etc...
Let me know if anybody has a issue with that before we actually implement
that..
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/