Re: [PATCH 04/10] idr: Percpu ida

[Kent Overstreet]

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 05:56:34PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> 
> > +{
> > +	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> > +	struct percpu_ida_cpu *tags;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	unsigned this_cpu;
> > +	int tag;
> > +
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> 
> > +	this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > +	tags = per_cpu_ptr(pool->tag_cpu, this_cpu);
> 
> tags = this_cpu_ptr(pool->tag_cpu);

I was breaking it apart because I was using this_cpu elsewhere too - for
the bitmap of which cpus have non empty freelists.

Or is this_cpu_ptr() doing something smarter than per_cpu_ptr(ptr,
smp_processer_id())? There's so many variants I'm not 100% sure they're
the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/