[no subject]

[Shaohua Li]

 $echo '0' > /sys/bus/workqueue/devices/xxx/numa
 $cat /sys/bus/workqueue/devices/xxx/numa

I got 1. It should be 0, the reason is copy_workqueue_attrs() called
in apply_workqueue_attrs() doesn't copy no_numa field.

Fix it by making copy_workqueue_attrs() copy ->no_numa too.  This
would also make get_unbound_pool() set a pool's ->no_numa attribute
according to the workqueue attributes used when the pool was created.
While harmelss, as ->no_numa isn't a pool attribute, this is a bit
confusing.  Clear it explicitly.

tj: Updated description and comments a bit.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 55f5f0a..cc5fa06 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3416,6 +3416,12 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
 {
 	to->nice = from->nice;
 	cpumask_copy(to->cpumask, from->cpumask);
+	/*
+	 * Unlike hash and equality test, this function doesn't ignore
+	 * ->no_numa as it is used for both pool and wq attrs.  Instead,
+	 * get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears ->no_numa after copying.
+	 */
+	to->no_numa = from->no_numa;
 }
 
 /* hash value of the content of @attr */
@@ -3583,6 +3589,12 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
 	lockdep_set_subclass(&pool->lock, 1);	/* see put_pwq() */
 	copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs);
 
+	/*
+	 * no_numa isn't a worker_pool attribute, always clear it.  See
+	 * 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail.
+	 */
+	pool->attrs->no_numa = 0;
+
 	/* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */
 	if (wq_numa_enabled) {
 		for_each_node(node) {
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/